Pawan Kalyan spoke from the dais at Lokesh's Yuvagalam closing ceremony. In his address, he spoke in his own way without gauging whether his lines were making any sense or simply ending up as nonsense.
Let us examine each of them and analyze the depth of foolishness in them.
Pawan: "This padayatra is not like Jagan's. It is a journey of understanding hardships. It is not a padayatra told by words but shown by actions."
In this statement, Pawan spoke the truth in the first line, stating, 'This padayatra is not like Jagan's.' However, the explanation he provided is ludicrous. Let's delve into understanding how both are different.
The impact of the Padyatra was initially observed with the marathon undertaken by YS Rajasekhara Reddy, who traversed the length and breadth of united Andhra Pradesh in 2004. It is well-documented how he endured physical hardships, pausing his Padyatra for 10 days until he recovered. He faced issues like sunstroke and leg problems, losing a significant amount of weight but persevering in his walk. Similar resilience was displayed by YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, who covered thousands of kilometers, undergoing weight loss and a darkened complexion due to exposure to the sun, dust, and a challenging atmosphere.
Contrastingly, consider Lokesh. He claimed to have gained 4 kilos by indulging in food at various joints during his Yuvagalam. How can he assert that he walked 3000-plus kilometers? Moreover, his complexion didn't change.
Furthermore, Jagan documented the issues faced by the people during his Padyatra in his book, while Lokesh, in his Red book, listed the names of opponents on whom he seeks revenge. That's the significant difference between Jagan's and Lokesh's padayatra.
Pawan: "I wish to walk but it is difficult as the people don't me walk. Many people will have the opportunity to understand the pros and cons of walking. I am a bit sad that I don't have such an opportunity."
Pawan imagines too much about himself. Who stops him from doing a padayatra? The fans? It is so funny that he imagines that all the people would overwhelm him if he goes into public. He feels he has a bigger following than anyone else in the nation. He laments too much for missing the opportunity to walk, cursing his image.
After all his party didn't even get a few thousands of votes in Telangana election in spite of his campaign. If he had such a big image, why he lost in both the constituencies he contested!? He created a history by losing in both the constituencies being a party head!
Pawan: "I felt very sad when Chandrababu was unjustly put in jail. I can understand his plight and I have experienced hardships and suffered many hardships since childhood."
What hardships did he face in childhood? Did Chiranjeevi used to beat him? Living in the shadow of his eldest brother's stardom, what hardships would he face? To understand if he had faced any hardships with education, even he is a zero in that aspect.
Pawan: "Sonia Gandhi put Jagan in jail. Showing revenge against Chandrababu is proof of Jagan's stupidity."
This is the height of Pawan's mindlessness. Who doesn't know the fact that TDP leaders who impeded in the case of Jagan Mohan Reddy to keep him behind bars for a longer time!
Pawan: "Why Jagan is silent if 30,000 girls disappeared? They used the volunteer system and made them collect the data of single women. When some people asked me to speak, I brought the data and was surprised to see it."
If 30,000 girls go missing, wouldn't anyone from their families come out and engage in agitation? Can Pawan Kalyan show at least one family that complains their girls have gone missing due to a particular volunteer? Is there any complaint registered in any police station or court regarding the missing 30,000 girls? What on earth is Pawan complaining about? It's disgusting and repugnant.
Madhunandan Akkishetty