'Animal' To 'Salaar': The Story Of Censor Board

'Animal' is a film laden with profanity, nudity, and violence, warranting an explicit 18+ rating. Despite being assigned an 'A' certificate, certain objectionable scenes still persist, necessitating cuts in compliance with CBFC rules which didnt happen. 

When activists raised concerns about the Censor Board's oversight in certifying 'Animal' only after cuts, significant changes were made within the Board.

Ravindra Bhatkar was replaced by Smita Vats Sharma as the new CEO under the supervision of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.

Additionally, the CBI has initiated a case against several CBFC officials, including others, following bribery allegations of Rs 6.5 lakh by Tamil actor Vishal in a separate case related to the film 'Mark Antony'. Readmore!

In the aftermath of these events, the Censor Board is adopting a stricter stance, evident in the recent developments.

Despite the absence of objectionable scenes like profanity, nudity, or vulgarity in 'Salaar', the film has been granted an 'A' certificate as per CBFC regulations.

This decision raises concerns, reminiscent of instances like 'Akhanda' and 'Adikesava,' which were given U/A certificates despite featuring graphic violence, casting doubt on the integrity of Censor Board officials.

Notably, Sandeep Reddy Vanga had previously mentioned that his next film, "Animal Park," would be more intense.

However, considering the altered circumstances, the CBFC is expected to trim scenes from the film, ensuring that no overloaded violence, profanity or nudity is screened in Indian theaters.

It's worth noting that the regional censor board in Hyderabad operated with strictness under A. Dhanalakshmi's leadership.

The question remains whether similar strict measures will be implemented by Smita Vats Sharma as the CEO of the Censor Board at the national level.

Show comments